Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard
dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen
book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially
unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more
recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.
12/24/12 at 14:17'war on terror' is the mission of the intelligence work, but the general direction of the fight against terrorism has not changed The report specifically mentioned the tense situation between China and the United States that may occur. In this regard, the Director of the Association of War and Peace Studies, Columbia University, Richard Boci (Richard K. Betts) analysis said, "The inescapable fact is that the strategic cooperation between China and the United States is extremely limited, (...) , but potential conflicts on both sides of the long-term The worries are unlikely to immediately change the principle challenges of U.S. national security strategy to curb the possibility of future conflict, to avoid unprovoked a result of the two sides clashed. "the simple fact that the strength of growth in China, accompanied by students is an American super the possibility of dominance dominance in the post-Cold War world suffered erosion, the relative strength of a rise and fall Sino-US conflict. "Richard Baici with frankly Washington Observer Weekly, said," Unless America's weak to shape the world reduced to a 'virtual target' control the development of the political and military in East Asia, China and the United States, the prospect of conflict is always present, but so far, the United States does not stop it or the willingness of other countries to exert influence. "anti-terrorism evolved into a" protracted war "2009 National Intelligence Strategy for U.S. intelligence agencies to determine the the six task: combating violent extremism; halting the spread of nuclear weapons and chemical and biological weapons, http://www.abercrombieboutiqueedfr.com ; strengthen strategic intelligence analysis and early warning; integrated anti-spyware capabilities; to strengthen computer network security; provide intelligence support for the United States in Afghanistan, Iraq, Mexico and other overseas locations, diplomatic, military and law enforcement actions. The report stressed that action to the opponent of the United States than ever before for stealing U.S. secrets interested, (...) , therefore, the intelligence agencies of the United States should focus on strengthening anti-spyware theft and espionage against U.S. computer networks, (...) . Network security and anti-spyware technology needs has always been the focus of U.S, (...) . intelligence strategy, but also in other countries attach great importance to intelligence work. Enhance network security requirements of the information age, including computer chip, the Internet, electronic systems, all of these devices security performance and sophistication are countries the intelligence development strategies can not be ignored, in recent years, http://mulberryukystore.webnode.com , much attention, "Dean Cheng explained. Boci agree Cheng Bin, saying that the U.S. military has been really worried about the information systems (civil and military), for fear of the risk of network "Pearl Harbor" event occurred, these have been let U.S. national security officials a headache while. New intelligence strategy merely reflects the intensification of this concern, does not essentially change than ever before. Similarly, anti-spyware issues have been worried about the U.S. military intelligence focus, as the intelligence work of the mission, and its importance has not changed , "Baici said Washington Observer Weekly. If the new National Intelligence Strategy and the Bush era version (2005) What is a clear distinction, (...) , the careful reader will find that the older version of the report has made it clear the "war on terror" is written to the intelligence mission field, but This one has disappeared in the 2009 version of the report. "Compared with the 2005 edition of the National Security Strategy, 2009 did not mention the war on terror, but its mission and the nature of the changes, just milder wording on terror if, after the war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan, (...) , the U.S. and The main task of the intelligence agencies still "Boci stressed. Dean Cheng pointed out that the Bush era, the U.S. intelligence agencies to track, capture Osama bin Laden as a core objective; Today, they still have to fight against terrorism, just focus shift from the "war on terror" as a "long-term confrontation". The U.S. intelligence community is more focused on crime adhere to the financial and banking system of the terrorists, mining terrorists will be brought to civil court, as the focus. "The main mission for the future of the U, http://hollisterencostore.webnode.com .S. intelligence strategy," Dean Cheng of the Washington Observer Weekly explains, "First of all, the fight against terrorism remains the primary goal, because this is the United States is still in the body in which the war; Second, the U.S. intelligence community To take into account the aspirations of all aspects, including some countries, organizations, groups may conflict with the United States. "concerned about China's new National Intelligence Strategy talking about network security, counter-espionage, also referred to the U.S. military in the eyes of potential challenges. The report mentioned the interest consistent "China and the United States on many issues, adding that China" rely heavily on the resources of diplomacy and military modernization initiatives, "making it difficult to cope with the country. "The concerns of the U.S. intelligence community is not new." Dean Cheng responded by saying, "the United States to observe Chinese, Chinese also observe the United States. Both sides have been concerned about the development of each other's military since the Clinton era, the Pentagon began analysis of the issue of China's military modernization, and now each other's concerns but to strengthen the Sino-US military exchanges. "Therefore, both the scope for cooperation between China and the United States, but also the possibility of conflict. Chengbin described said: "The leaders of the two countries saw the need for the strengthening of exchanges, also have said the two sides should strengthen military cooperation, the two countries also have potential military conflict can not be untied. Example, U.S. arms sales to have occurred EP3 collision incident. U.S. government will certainly continue arms sales to Taiwan, Sino-US military relations remains to be seen what is the variable. "" As long as there is no large-scale disaster caused by the conflict, such as the Taiwan crisis China and the United States should have a positive cooperation, the development of peaceful relations, limited military exchange, to continue to share intelligence mutually beneficial, such as in the fight against terrorism, "Boci concluded. At the same time, http://www.saclancelpaschermfr.com , the experts believe that China and the United States in the field of intelligence, such as transnational crime and counter-terrorism intelligence work to strengthen cooperation.